H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Jurgen Fassbender H2H: 1-0
Mark Edmondson holds a 1–0 lead over Jurgen Fassbender in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Edmondson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Edmondson won the 1976 Hamburg third round 6-4 0-6 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 1976* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Edmondson | 6-4 0-6 4-1 (ret.) | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Jurgen Fassbender | #618 | #31 | 0 | 1,868 | 170 | 167 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Jurgen Fassbender | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1972 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1973 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #46 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1974 | 41–30 | 57.7% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1975 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1976 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | 1978 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #242 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |