H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Karl Meiler H2H: 1-1
Mark Edmondson and Karl Meiler are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karl Meiler leads 1–0 on clay, while Mark Edmondson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karl Meiler won the 1982 Kitzbuhel third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1982* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Karl Meiler | 6-2 6-4 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1981* | Linz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Edmondson | 6-2 7-6 | Karl Meiler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Karl Meiler | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,894 | 252 | 189 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Karl Meiler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | 1971 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1972 | 15–5 | 75.0% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1973 | 47–28 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1974 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #67 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1975 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #31 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1976 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #54 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1977 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1978 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #169 | 1,653 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,603 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #270 | 1,554 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,588 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |