H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mark Edmondson vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 2-2

Mark Edmondson and Ken Rosewall are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Edmondson leads 2–1 on grass, while Ken Rosewall leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Edmondson won the 1980 Brisbane fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Edmondson
AUS Age 72 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Ken Rosewall
AUS Age 91 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 10, 1980* Brisbane ATP 250 R16 Grass Mark Edmondson #70 3-6 6-2 6-2 Ken Rosewall #207 Match data
Nov 16, 1978* Hong Kong ATP 250 R32 Hard Ken Rosewall #35 6-1 6-3 Mark Edmondson #68 Match data
Jan 12, 1977* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Grass Ken Rosewall #13 6-4 7-6 4-6 6-4 Mark Edmondson #37 Match data
Jan 8, 1976* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Grass Mark Edmondson #212 6-1 2-6 6-2 6-4 Ken Rosewall #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Edmondson #525 #15 0 1,927 244 231 51.4% 1 0 0 0 5 6
Ken Rosewall #255 #2 0 2,231 541 195 73.5% 4 1 0 0 35 40

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Edmondson Ken Rosewall
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1975 2–4 33.3% #212 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1976 42–29 59.2% #35 1,754 1 2 — — — — — — —
23 1977 16–24 40.0% #99 1,598 1 2 — — — — — — —
24 1978 15–16 48.4% #79 1,682 1 3 — — — — — — —
25 1979 26–26 50.0% #95 1,740 1 3 — — — — — — —
26 1980 18–23 43.9% #91 1,714 1 3 — — — — — — —
27 1981 59–26 69.4% #23 1,902 1 6 — — — — — — —
28 1982 27–25 51.9% #18 1,713 1 6 — — — — — — —
29 1983 16–17 48.5% #37 1,687 1 6 — — — — — — —
30 1984 9–18 33.3% #145 1,572 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 1985 9–10 47.4% #115 1,595 1 6 — — — — — — —
32 1986 3–9 25.0% #307 1,540 1 6 — — — — — — —
33 1987 1–1 50.0% #523 1,550 1 6 1968 45–12 78.9% — 1,856 1 5
34 — — — — — — — 1969 49–21 70.0% — 1,941 1 8
35 — — — — — — — 1970 72–21 77.4% — 2,083 2 14
36 — — — — — — — 1971 80–24 76.9% — 2,154 3 22
37 — — — — — — — 1972 61–15 80.3% — 2,107 4 29
38 — — — — — — — 1973 65–17 79.3% #6 2,102 4 34
39 — — — — — — — 1974 28–8 77.8% #9 2,106 4 34
40 — — — — — — — 1975 41–12 77.4% #6 1,994 4 37
41 — — — — — — — 1976 35–18 66.0% #13 1,974 4 39
42 — — — — — — — 1977 39–20 66.1% #12 1,975 4 40
43 — — — — — — — 1978 19–19 50.0% #34 1,808 4 40
44 — — — — — — — 1979 4–5 44.4% #207 1,746 4 40
45 — — — — — — — 1980 3–3 50.0% #255 1,746 4 40