H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Mike Cahill H2H: 2-0
Mark Edmondson holds a 2–0 lead over Mike Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Edmondson leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Edmondson won the 1981 Indianapolis second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1981 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Mark Edmondson | 6-2 6-1 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
| Sep 16, 1976* | Bermuda | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Edmondson | 6-2 6-3 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Mike Cahill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |