H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Nick Saviano H2H: 2-1
Mark Edmondson holds a 2–1 lead over Nick Saviano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Edmondson leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nick Saviano won the 1983 Rotterdam third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1983* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nick Saviano | 7-6 6-2 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1981* | Linz | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Mark Edmondson | 6-1 7-6 | Nick Saviano | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1980* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mark Edmondson | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Nick Saviano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Nick Saviano | #736 | #48 | 0 | 1,789 | 158 | 199 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Nick Saviano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #115 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #62 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | 1978 | 32–32 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #72 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #93 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1981 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #97 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1982 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #99 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |