H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 0-2
Pavel Slozil holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pavel Slozil leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pavel Slozil won the 1982 Rotterdam third round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1982* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pavel Slozil | 7-6 6-4 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1981* | Nancy | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Pavel Slozil | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |