H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Peter Feigl H2H: 1-0
Mark Edmondson holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Feigl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Edmondson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Edmondson won the 1976 Australian Open second round 6-1 4-6 7-6 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 1975* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mark Edmondson | 6-1 4-6 7-6 4-6 6-1 | Peter Feigl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Peter Feigl | #470 | #35 | 0 | 1,794 | 107 | 113 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Peter Feigl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1976 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #272 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1977 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1978 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #75 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #93 | 1,539 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #137 | 1,583 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |