H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Raul Ramirez H2H: 2-1
Mark Edmondson holds a 2–1 lead over Raul Ramirez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Edmondson leads 1–0 on clay, while Raul Ramirez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Edmondson won the 1982 Las Vegas quarterfinal 6-3 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 73
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1982* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mark Edmondson | 6-3 2-0 (ret.) | Raul Ramirez | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1977* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Raul Ramirez | 6-4 9-8 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1976 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Edmondson | 1-6 7-6 7-5 | Raul Ramirez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Raul Ramirez | #744 | #4 | 0 | 2,146 | 531 | 261 | 67.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Raul Ramirez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #26 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 69–35 | 66.3% | #19 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | 1975 | 67–29 | 69.8% | #13 | 1,983 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1976 | 96–33 | 74.4% | #5 | 2,054 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1977 | 65–25 | 72.2% | #8 | 1,984 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1978 | 70–29 | 70.7% | #8 | 1,949 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1979 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #40 | 1,878 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #35 | 1,789 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #32 | 1,870 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 28–13 | 68.3% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #74 | 1,837 | 0 | 20 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |