H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Richard Meyer H2H: 0-1
Richard Meyer holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Meyer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Meyer won the 1982 Australian Open first round 6-4 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 1982* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Richard Meyer | 6-4 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Richard Meyer | #1,075 | #83 | 0 | 1,688 | 44 | 76 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Richard Meyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | 1978 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1979 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1980 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #89 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1981 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1982 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #248 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |