H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mark Knowles vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 0-2
Andrei Olhovskiy holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Knowles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1996 Hamburg Masters second round 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1996* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andrei Olhovskiy | 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(7) | Mark Knowles | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1996* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Andrei Olhovskiy | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Mark Knowles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Knowles | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |