H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mark Knowles vs Grant Connell H2H: 0-1
Grant Connell holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Knowles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grant Connell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1988 Indianapolis second round 6-3 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1988* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Grant Connell | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Mark Knowles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Knowles | Grant Connell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |