H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Knowles vs Jonathan Canter H2H: 1-0
Mark Knowles holds a 1–0 lead over Jonathan Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Knowles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Knowles won the 1994 Miami Masters first round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1994* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Mark Knowles | 7-5 7-5 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Knowles | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |