H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Knowles vs Tommy Ho H2H: 1-0
Mark Knowles holds a 1–0 lead over Tommy Ho in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Knowles leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Knowles won the 1996 Shanghai fourth round 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1996* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mark Knowles | 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-4 | Tommy Ho | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tommy Ho | #1,306 | #85 | 522 | 1,622 | 36 | 66 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Knowles | Tommy Ho | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #625 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #641 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #482 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #250 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |