H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Mark Kratzmann vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 0-1
Pavel Slozil holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Kratzmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pavel Slozil leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pavel Slozil won the 1984 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1984* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Pavel Slozil | 6-4 6-0 6-3 | Mark Kratzmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Kratzmann | #1,147 | #50 | 557 | 1,750 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Kratzmann | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #616 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #209 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #182 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #122 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #208 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |