H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Kratzmann vs Peter Doohan H2H: 0-1
Peter Doohan holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Kratzmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Doohan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Peter Doohan won the 1985 Melbourne semifinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 1985* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Peter Doohan | 6-4 6-3 | Mark Kratzmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Kratzmann | #1,147 | #50 | 557 | 1,750 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Kratzmann | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #616 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #209 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #182 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #122 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #208 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 |