H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Kratzmann vs Tomas Smid H2H: 0-1
Tomas Smid holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Kratzmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1984 Wimbledon second round 6-3 2-6 6-7 7-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tomas Smid | 6-3 2-6 6-7 7-6 8-6 | Mark Kratzmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Kratzmann | #1,147 | #50 | 557 | 1,750 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Kratzmann | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #616 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #209 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #182 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #122 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #208 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |