H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
M. Petchey vs D. Rostagno H2H: 0-1
D. Rostagno holds a 1–0 lead over M. Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, D. Rostagno leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, D. Rostagno won the 1995 Miami Masters first round 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | D. Rostagno | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | M. Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D. Rostagno | #1,316 | #13 | 1,392 | 1,920 | 192 | 180 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | M. Petchey | D. Rostagno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #418 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #428 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #89 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #93 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #111 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #486 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |