H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mark Petchey vs Jim Pugh H2H: 1-0
Mark Petchey holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Pugh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Petchey leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Petchey won the 1991 Wimbledon first round 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-3 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mark Petchey | 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-3 8-6 | Jim Pugh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jim Pugh | #1,147 | #37 | 423 | 1,832 | 85 | 95 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Petchey | Jim Pugh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #60 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #397 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1074 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |