H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
M. Petchey vs N. Pereira H2H: 1-0
M. Petchey holds a 1–0 lead over N. Pereira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, M. Petchey leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, M. Petchey won the 1996 Nottingham third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1996* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | M. Petchey | 6-2 6-1 | N. Pereira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| N. Pereira | #1,101 | #74 | 658 | 1,689 | 63 | 114 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | M. Petchey | N. Pereira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #142 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #122 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #110 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |