H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Petchey vs Patrik Kuhnen H2H: 0-1
Patrik Kuhnen holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patrik Kuhnen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patrik Kuhnen won the 1991 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Patrik Kuhnen | 6-2 6-4 6-3 | Mark Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrik Kuhnen | #1,341 | #43 | 574 | 1,787 | 126 | 151 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Petchey | Patrik Kuhnen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #86 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #89 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #119 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #189 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #187 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #504 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |