H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Petchey vs Peter Lundgren H2H: 0-1
Peter Lundgren holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Lundgren leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Peter Lundgren won the 1991 Manchester third round 6-1 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1991* | Manchester | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Peter Lundgren | 6-1 5-7 6-2 | Mark Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Petchey | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 |