H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mark Petchey vs Richard Matuszewski H2H: 1-0
Mark Petchey holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Matuszewski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Petchey leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Petchey won the 1994 Beijing third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1994* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Petchey | 6-3 6-0 | Richard Matuszewski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Richard Matuszewski | #839 | #49 | 405 | 1,695 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Petchey | Richard Matuszewski | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #362 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #90 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #219 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #143 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #307 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |