H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mark Petchey vs Thierry Champion H2H: 0-1
Thierry Champion holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thierry Champion leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thierry Champion won the 1994 Bordeaux third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1994* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thierry Champion | 6-4 6-2 | Mark Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thierry Champion | #790 | #44 | 744 | 1,757 | 102 | 162 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Petchey | Thierry Champion | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #128 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #105 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #125 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #59 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #48 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #266 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #191 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #279 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |