H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Bohdan Ulihrach H2H: 2-1
Mark Philippoussis holds a 2–1 lead over Bohdan Ulihrach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Bohdan Ulihrach leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1999 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1999* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| May 29, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 3-6 6-7(2) 7-5 6-4 9-7 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1996* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-3 6-4 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Bohdan Ulihrach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |