H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Carlos Moya H2H: 3-2

Mark Philippoussis holds a 3–2 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Carlos Moya leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2003 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-4 7-6(7).

AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 30, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Carlos Moya #4 6-2 6-4 7-6(7) Mark Philippoussis #52 Match data
May 31, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Carlos Moya #19 6-2 7-6(7) 7-6(9) Mark Philippoussis #130 Match data
Mar 15, 1999* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Mark Philippoussis #11 5-7 6-4 6-4 4-6 6-2 Carlos Moya #1 Match data
Sep 13, 1998* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Mark Philippoussis #22 6-1 6-4 5-7 6-4 Carlos Moya #10 Match data
Mar 15, 1997* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mark Philippoussis #32 6-4 6-3 Carlos Moya #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,033 551 309 64.1% 1 3 0 0 16 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Carlos Moya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,625 0 1
19 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,764 0 2
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,815 0 3
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,894 1 5
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,762 1 5
23 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,811 1 6
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,735 1 7
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,904 1 14
27 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10 2004 53–17 75.7% #5 1,903 1 17
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,803 1 18
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,756 1 19
30 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20
31 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20
32 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20
33 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,651 1 20