Mark Philippoussis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Mark Philippoussis holds a 1–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1999 San Jose final 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | 6-3 6-2 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data | Feb 14, 1999* | F | San Jose | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,010 | 291 | 193 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,631 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #30 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,854 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,655 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,731 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1994 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1996 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1997 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1998 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 28 | 13 | 41 | 68.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1999 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2002 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2004 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 178 | 115 | 293 | 60.8% | 35 | 35 | 70 | 50.0% | 48 | 22 | 70 | 68.6% | 30 | 21 | 51 | 58.8% | — | 39 | 71 | 110 | 35.5% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 422/484 of Mark Philippoussis's and 128/143 of Cecil Mamiit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 1994 | 4/4 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 58.1% | 64.9% | 40.4% | 42.4% | 25.4% | 54.8% | 35.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 41/42 | 11.9 | 4.9 | 58.5% | 79.7% | 48.8% | 70.4% | 41.4% | 66.6% | 36.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 45/56 | 14.1 | 5.9 | 59.0% | 81.0% | 47.5% | 63.5% | 37.3% | 67.2% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 56/61 | 13.8 | 5.6 | 58.7% | 79.5% | 51.7% | 61.7% | 42.5% | 68.0% | 32.9% | 1996 | 3/4 | 2.7 | 5.3 | 45.4% | 60.2% | 51.2% | 50.2% | 42.9% | 55.3% | 33.2% |
| 21 | 1998 | 41/50 | 12.6 | 5.0 | 58.5% | 78.7% | 49.7% | 59.9% | 40.0% | 66.8% | 35.5% | 1997 | 8/9 | 4.4 | 2.0 | 59.6% | 67.9% | 47.4% | 49.8% | 55.1% | 59.7% | 35.8% |
| 22 | 1999 | 33/45 | 14.3 | 4.8 | 57.4% | 80.6% | 49.5% | 63.7% | 39.4% | 67.4% | 34.9% | 1998 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 61.5% | 70.8% | 56.7% | 42.9% | 80.0% | 65.4% | 42.9% |
| 23 | 2000 | 49/64 | 15.6 | 5.5 | 56.0% | 81.4% | 52.4% | 59.2% | 40.4% | 68.7% | 34.9% | 1999 | 32/34 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 57.3% | 65.9% | 47.7% | 50.8% | 38.8% | 58.0% | 39.6% |
| 24 | 2001 | 16/18 | 16.4 | 3.8 | 56.8% | 79.7% | 51.0% | 64.7% | 34.2% | 67.4% | 35.1% | 2000 | 14/18 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 54.3% | 67.2% | 48.8% | 56.2% | 38.3% | 59.0% | 36.7% |
| 25 | 2002 | 24/28 | 16.2 | 6.6 | 55.5% | 79.7% | 53.3% | 64.7% | 46.2% | 67.8% | 35.4% | 2001 | 23/28 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 58.1% | 67.3% | 49.1% | 61.8% | 35.1% | 59.7% | 36.4% |
| 26 | 2003 | 51/52 | 14.7 | 4.9 | 56.1% | 79.7% | 50.9% | 65.8% | 51.6% | 67.1% | 34.4% | 2002 | 20/22 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 57.9% | 66.7% | 49.9% | 60.6% | 39.4% | 59.5% | 37.2% |
| 27 | 2004 | 23/24 | 12.5 | 5.3 | 56.8% | 77.3% | 45.9% | 57.2% | 39.6% | 63.7% | 33.2% | 2003 | 18/18 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 62.6% | 62.6% | 42.3% | 49.5% | 41.2% | 55.2% | 34.4% |
| 28 | 2005 | 19/20 | 12.2 | 4.5 | 62.8% | 77.2% | 49.4% | 56.6% | 34.3% | 66.7% | 31.2% | 2004 | 4/4 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 51.5% | 68.5% | 51.2% | 54.3% | 24.2% | 59.9% | 37.9% |
| 29 | 2006 | 20/20 | 14.0 | 4.9 | 55.3% | 79.7% | 48.8% | 59.4% | 34.5% | 66.0% | 33.4% | 2005 | 3/3 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 68.5% | 74.3% | 58.9% | 36.4% | 27.8% | 69.5% | 36.5% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2/2 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 60.9% | 72.3% | 51.4% | 61.1% | 54.2% | 63.8% | 35.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1492 | 104.4 | -1.87 | -2.04 | 0.773 | 44.9% | +22 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.10 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1766 | 149.6 | +4.26 | -1.00 | 1.098 | 51.6% | +23 | -186 | -194 | 55.4% | +0.51 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | -0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1840 | 149.6 | +4.59 | -0.57 | 1.113 | 52.1% | +22 | -218 | -226 | 57.1% | +0.49 | 9–7 (56%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | +1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1854 | 146.5 | +5.16 | -3.42 | 1.028 | 50.7% | -13 | -55 | -123 | 60.3% | +0.36 | 17–3 (85%) | 23–13 (64%) | — | -0.04 | 1996 | 1471 | 104.3 | +1.39 | -2.25 | 0.743 | 44.8% | +17 | — | — | 18.2% | -2.27 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1908 | 152.3 | +4.61 | -1.16 | 1.069 | 51.2% | -5 | -126 | -84 | 60.1% | +0.49 | 7–9 (44%) | 14–12 (54%) | — | -1.16 | 1997 | 1441 | 108.9 | -1.33 | -0.30 | 0.887 | 47.8% | +21 | — | — | 30.4% | -1.17 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +0.42 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1890 | 149.4 | +4.70 | -0.77 | 1.068 | 51.3% | +38 | -161 | -21 | 61.6% | +0.54 | 12–10 (55%) | 16–11 (59%) | — | -1.51 | 1998 | 1432 | 101.1 | -0.76 | -1.41 | 1.238 | 53.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | +0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1895 | 148.6 | +5.41 | -1.43 | 1.113 | 51.6% | +21 | -144 | +61 | 60.9% | +0.61 | 14–8 (64%) | 26–20 (57%) | — | -0.59 | 1999 | 1552 | 118.6 | -2.72 | +1.29 | 0.942 | 48.7% | +21 | -25 | -7 | 46.0% | -0.43 | 6–6 (50%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | +1.34 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1804 | 130.5 | +3.11 | -1.38 | 1.076 | 51.5% | +5 | — | — | 58.7% | +0.48 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | +0.83 | 2000 | 1538 | 123.5 | -0.49 | +0.64 | 0.895 | 47.9% | +26 | — | — | 38.6% | -0.75 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.42 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1772 | 147.8 | +3.64 | -0.25 | 1.099 | 51.6% | +15 | -59 | +179 | 50.0% | +0.35 | 5–3 (63%) | 8–16 (33%) | — | -2.36 | 2001 | 1556 | 118.7 | -2.71 | -1.19 | 0.903 | 48.3% | -16 | — | -31 | 44.3% | -0.54 | 3–10 (23%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +1.11 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1882 | 149.2 | +4.49 | -1.14 | 1.047 | 50.9% | -35 | -127 | +200 | 60.7% | +0.48 | 10–4 (71%) | 17–12 (59%) | — | -2.84 | 2002 | 1556 | 122.3 | -2.06 | -0.26 | 0.918 | 48.5% | +28 | — | -90 | 38.9% | -0.89 | 1–3 (25%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | +0.65 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1650 | 118.2 | +0.10 | -2.14 | 0.915 | 48.5% | -8 | +49 | +352 | 41.5% | -0.52 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–9 (36%) | — | +0.80 | 2003 | 1434 | 110.8 | -4.02 | -1.08 | 0.769 | 45.2% | +49 | +79 | +15 | 26.7% | -1.56 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.14 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1656 | 122.6 | +1.88 | -3.91 | 0.939 | 49.2% | -52 | — | +334 | 48.9% | -0.15 | 2–4 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -0.33 | 2004 | 1493 | 110.5 | -0.62 | +1.04 | 0.944 | 49.1% | +47 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.38 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.32 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1732 | 128.9 | +2.70 | -1.85 | 0.984 | 49.8% | -151 | — | +285 | 49.1% | -0.04 | 5–2 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -1.13 | 2005 | 1469 | 101.4 | +0.98 | -1.17 | 1.195 | 52.7% | +44 | — | — | 60.0% | +1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.37 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1430 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1433 | 89.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1469 | 105.8 | -0.73 | -1.29 | 0.989 | 49.4% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1449 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1440 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1432 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2015 | 1708 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2011 | 151.8 | +4.10 | -1.55 | 1.052 | 50.9% | 0 | -124 | +113 | 57.0% | +0.37 | 96–66 (59%) | 158–135 (54%) | 104.5 | -1.58 | — | 1631 | 117.9 | -2.17 | -0.11 | 0.899 | 48.0% | +20 | +21 | -35 | 39.3% | -0.78 | 15–34 (31%) | 24–20 (55%) | 99.3 | +2.12 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Mirnyi | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jul 25, 2002 | H2H |
| Jonas Bjorkman | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 30, 2005 | H2H |
| Xavier Malisse | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 6, 2003 | H2H |
| Justin Gimelstob | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 15, 2001 | H2H |
| Todd Martin | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 8, 2001 | H2H |