H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Chris Woodruff H2H: 5-3

Mark Philippoussis holds a 5–3 lead over Chris Woodruff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Chris Woodruff leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2000 Hong Kong fourth round 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3.

AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 6, 2000* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Mark Philippoussis #15 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 Chris Woodruff #69 Match data
Mar 15, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mark Philippoussis #35 6-3 6-4 Chris Woodruff #47 Match data
Mar 14, 1999* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Mark Philippoussis #16 6-1 6-2 Chris Woodruff #550 Match data
Feb 18, 1999* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Mark Philippoussis #14 6-3 7-6(3) Chris Woodruff #717 Match data
Oct 9, 1997* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Carpet Chris Woodruff #30 6-4 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #18 Match data
Aug 3, 1997* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Chris Woodruff #57 6-4 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #14 Match data
Mar 8, 1997* Scottsdale ATP 250 SF Hard Mark Philippoussis #42 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Chris Woodruff #64 Match data
Feb 29, 1996* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Chris Woodruff #112 7-5 4-6 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Chris Woodruff #1,334 #29 1,273 1,829 108 106 50.5% 0 1 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Chris Woodruff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0
19 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4 1993 1–2 33.3% #337 1,496 0 0
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5 1994 0–2 0.0% #300 1,480 0 0
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7 1995 1–2 33.3% #135 1,485 0 0
23 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 1996 20–18 52.6% #43 1,667 0 0
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9 1997 35–21 62.5% #30 1,777 0 1
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 1998 0–1 0.0% #1324 1,761 0 1
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 1999 22–19 53.7% #51 1,770 0 2
27 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10 2000 18–23 43.9% #67 1,687 0 2
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10 2001 11–17 39.3% #118 1,630 0 2
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11 2002 0–1 0.0% #496 1,589 0 2