H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-2
David Prinosil holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2000 Paris Masters quarterfinal 4-6 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2000* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Carpet | Mark Philippoussis | 4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | David Prinosil | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1998* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | David Prinosil | 6-3 6-7(8) 6-3 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1997* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | David Prinosil | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |