H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Eyal Ran H2H: 1-0
Mark Philippoussis holds a 1–0 lead over Eyal Ran in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1996 Australian Open second round 2-6 6-4 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 2-6 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Eyal Ran | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Eyal Ran | #1,153 | #138 | 315 | 1,531 | 13 | 30 | 30.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Eyal Ran | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #732 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #187 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #193 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |