H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Felix Mantilla H2H: 0-1
Felix Mantilla holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Felix Mantilla leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Felix Mantilla won the 1996 Gstaad third round 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 1996* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 6-4 7-6(6) | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Felix Mantilla | #1,133 | #10 | 2,385 | 1,960 | 307 | 218 | 58.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Felix Mantilla | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #55 | 1,733 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,709 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #102 | 1,693 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #117 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #425 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 |