H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Grant Stafford H2H: 1-1

Mark Philippoussis and Grant Stafford are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1998 Indianapolis round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Grant Stafford
RSA Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Philippoussis #22 6-3 6-2 Grant Stafford #125 Match data Aug 19, 1998* R64 Indianapolis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Grant Stafford #69 6-2 6-2 6-0 Mark Philippoussis #439 Match data Jan 19, 1994* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,010 291 193 60.1% 0 1 0 2 8 11
Grant Stafford #1,161 #53 750 1,807 83 111 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Grant Stafford
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,765 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 33–23 58.9% #30 1,840 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,854 0 4 1991 5–6 45.5% #172 1,552 0 0
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,908 0 5 1992 4–4 50.0% #191 1,635 0 0
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,890 0 7 1993 17–14 54.8% #86 1,717 0 0
23 2000 42–22 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 1994 11–21 34.4% #168 1,558 0 0
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,804 0 9 1995 2–7 22.2% #288 1,530 0 0
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 1996 10–13 43.5% #83 1,563 0 0
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 1997 21–20 51.2% #74 1,657 0 0
27 2004 8–16 33.3% #109 1,649 0 10 1998 12–21 36.4% #163 1,564 0 0
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,655 0 10 1999 0–3 0.0% #475 1,535 0 0
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,731 0 11 2000 1–1 50.0% #435 1,592 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Philippoussis Grant Stafford
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 20 9 29 69.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1991 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1998 20 11 31 64.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 1999 20 7 27 74.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
23 2000 28 13 41 68.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 9 12 21 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1996 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2003 24 12 36 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 10 11 21 47.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1998 8 12 20 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
28 2005 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 115 293 60.8% 35 35 70 50.0% 48 22 70 68.6% 30 21 51 58.8% — 53 70 123 43.1% 7 14 21 33.3% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 8 11 27.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 422/484 of Mark Philippoussis's and 168/193 of Grant Stafford's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mark Philippoussis Grant Stafford
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 4/4 6.0 4.0 58.1% 64.9% 40.4% 42.4% 25.4% 54.8% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 41/42 11.9 4.9 58.5% 79.7% 48.8% 70.4% 41.4% 66.6% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 45/56 14.1 5.9 59.0% 81.0% 47.5% 63.5% 37.3% 67.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 56/61 13.8 5.6 58.7% 79.5% 51.7% 61.7% 42.5% 68.0% 32.9% 1991 10/11 1.6 2.9 66.6% 61.7% 43.9% 53.1% 40.6% 55.5% 39.0%
21 1998 41/50 12.6 5.0 58.5% 78.7% 49.7% 59.9% 40.0% 66.8% 35.5% 1992 8/8 3.6 5.8 60.4% 64.4% 34.5% 42.1% 40.5% 53.0% 42.7%
22 1999 33/45 14.3 4.8 57.4% 80.6% 49.5% 63.7% 39.4% 67.4% 34.9% 1993 25/31 2.3 3.2 61.9% 66.5% 46.6% 53.3% 50.5% 59.1% 44.0%
23 2000 49/64 15.6 5.5 56.0% 81.4% 52.4% 59.2% 40.4% 68.7% 34.9% 1994 26/32 2.3 4.2 60.8% 64.3% 43.2% 48.3% 39.9% 56.0% 39.8%
24 2001 16/18 16.4 3.8 56.8% 79.7% 51.0% 64.7% 34.2% 67.4% 35.1% 1995 7/9 3.7 4.7 61.7% 64.6% 44.0% 53.7% 40.4% 56.3% 39.2%
25 2002 24/28 16.2 6.6 55.5% 79.7% 53.3% 64.7% 46.2% 67.8% 35.4% 1996 22/23 4.9 2.7 60.2% 70.3% 49.0% 61.2% 37.6% 61.8% 38.5%
26 2003 51/52 14.7 4.9 56.1% 79.7% 50.9% 65.8% 51.6% 67.1% 34.4% 1997 36/41 4.8 3.5 55.4% 71.7% 51.0% 53.0% 53.2% 62.4% 41.1%
27 2004 23/24 12.5 5.3 56.8% 77.3% 45.9% 57.2% 39.6% 63.7% 33.2% 1998 30/33 3.9 4.3 56.9% 67.1% 44.0% 49.0% 33.6% 57.0% 38.4%
28 2005 19/20 12.2 4.5 62.8% 77.2% 49.4% 56.6% 34.3% 66.7% 31.2% 1999 2/3 1.5 6.5 61.6% 70.0% 34.4% 45.2% 13.3% 56.4% 35.6%
29 2006 20/20 14.0 4.9 55.3% 79.7% 48.8% 59.4% 34.5% 66.0% 33.4% 2000 2/2 8.0 7.5 61.9% 79.4% 48.2% 59.2% 34.2% 68.1% 39.9%
Career — 422/484 13.9 5.2 57.6% 79.6% 50.0% 62.5% 41.0% 67.0% 34.7% — 168/194 3.6 3.8 59.4% 67.6% 45.9% 52.2% 42.6% 58.8% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Philippoussis Grant Stafford
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1492 104.4 -1.87 -2.04 0.773 44.9% +22 — — 20.0% -2.10 1–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1766 149.6 +4.26 -1.00 1.098 51.6% +23 -186 -194 55.4% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 13–11 (54%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1840 149.6 +4.59 -0.57 1.113 52.1% +22 -218 -226 57.1% +0.49 9–7 (56%) 19–13 (59%) — +1.05 1990 1493 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.11
20 1997 1854 146.5 +5.16 -3.42 1.028 50.7% -13 -55 -123 60.3% +0.36 17–3 (85%) 23–13 (64%) — -0.04 1991 1553 120.2 -2.74 +0.10 0.877 47.4% +35 — — 37.9% -0.86 4–0 (100%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35
21 1998 1908 152.3 +4.61 -1.16 1.069 51.2% -5 -126 -84 60.1% +0.49 7–9 (44%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.16 1992 1636 116.0 -2.73 +2.89 0.909 47.9% -35 — +9 52.4% -0.43 1–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.68
22 1999 1890 149.4 +4.70 -0.77 1.068 51.3% +38 -161 -21 61.6% +0.54 12–10 (55%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.51 1993 1718 129.9 -1.48 +4.18 1.076 51.6% -17 — -65 55.2% +0.18 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.11
23 2000 1895 148.6 +5.41 -1.43 1.113 51.6% +21 -144 +61 60.9% +0.61 14–8 (64%) 26–20 (57%) — -0.59 1994 1558 130.9 -3.88 +1.31 0.904 47.9% +81 -50 +43 40.5% -0.46 3–10 (23%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.87
24 2001 1804 130.5 +3.11 -1.38 1.076 51.5% +5 — — 58.7% +0.48 3–7 (30%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.83 1995 1530 116.1 -1.20 +0.97 0.895 47.6% +80 — — 32.0% -0.92 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.12
25 2002 1772 147.8 +3.64 -0.25 1.099 51.6% +15 -59 +179 50.0% +0.35 5–3 (63%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.36 1996 1563 122.3 -0.43 -0.01 1.008 50.1% +9 — +95 48.3% +0.05 2–6 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.72
26 2003 1882 149.2 +4.49 -1.14 1.047 50.9% -35 -127 +200 60.7% +0.48 10–4 (71%) 17–12 (59%) — -2.84 1997 1658 134.1 +0.10 +3.52 1.093 51.4% -32 -111 +67 50.0% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.14
27 2004 1650 118.2 +0.10 -2.14 0.915 48.5% -8 +49 +352 41.5% -0.52 2–4 (33%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.80 1998 1565 127.0 -3.40 +0.46 0.893 47.5% +59 -78 +128 39.2% -0.82 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.07
28 2005 1656 122.6 +1.88 -3.91 0.939 49.2% -52 — +334 48.9% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.33 1999 1535 103.1 +1.15 -0.33 0.817 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.86 — — — -0.39
29 2006 1732 128.9 +2.70 -1.85 0.984 49.8% -151 — +285 49.1% -0.04 5–2 (71%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.13 2000 1592 112.5 +0.96 +1.20 1.250 53.0% — — — 62.5% +0.63 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
38 2015 1708 98.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2011 151.8 +4.10 -1.55 1.052 50.9% 0 -124 +113 57.0% +0.37 96–66 (59%) 158–135 (54%) 104.5 -1.58 — 1808 133.9 -1.78 +1.85 0.977 49.4% +21 -80 +52 44.8% -0.34 26–38 (41%) 27–27 (50%) 100.0 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.