H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 2-0
Mark Philippoussis holds a 2–0 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2003 Shanghai quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2003* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-3 7-6(4) | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2000* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 7-6(8) 4-6 7-6(3) | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |