H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Harel Levy H2H: 1-0
Mark Philippoussis holds a 1–0 lead over Harel Levy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2001 Hong Kong third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2001* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-3 7-5 | Harel Levy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Harel Levy | #1,024 | #30 | 1,023 | 1,732 | 43 | 83 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Harel Levy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #111 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #247 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |