H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2006 Indianapolis second round 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-4 7-6(3) | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mark Philippoussis | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |