Mark Philippoussis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 4–1 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2000 US Open round of 64 6-4 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data | Sep 1, 2000* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data | Mar 25, 2000* | R16 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data | Nov 13, 1999* | QF | Stockholm Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Mark Philippoussis | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data | Jun 10, 1999* | R32 | Queen's Club Championships | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Grass |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 7-6(7) 5-7 7-6(6) | Mark Philippoussis | Match data | Mar 11, 1998* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,010 | 291 | 193 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,949 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #30 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,854 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,655 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,731 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,568 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,504 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1994 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1997 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1998 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 63.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1999 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1999 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 2000 | 28 | 13 | 41 | 68.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2000 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2001 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2001 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 69.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2002 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2003 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15 | 18 | 33 | 45.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2005 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 178 | 115 | 293 | 60.8% | 35 | 35 | 70 | 50.0% | 48 | 22 | 70 | 68.6% | 30 | 21 | 51 | 58.8% | — | 160 | 126 | 286 | 55.9% | 10 | 32 | 42 | 23.8% | 23 | 21 | 44 | 52.3% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 422/484 of Mark Philippoussis's and 105/109 of Jan-Michael Gambill's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 1994 | 4/4 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 58.1% | 64.9% | 40.4% | 42.4% | 25.4% | 54.8% | 35.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 41/42 | 11.9 | 4.9 | 58.5% | 79.7% | 48.8% | 70.4% | 41.4% | 66.6% | 36.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 45/56 | 14.1 | 5.9 | 59.0% | 81.0% | 47.5% | 63.5% | 37.3% | 67.2% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 56/61 | 13.8 | 5.6 | 58.7% | 79.5% | 51.7% | 61.7% | 42.5% | 68.0% | 32.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 41/50 | 12.6 | 5.0 | 58.5% | 78.7% | 49.7% | 59.9% | 40.0% | 66.8% | 35.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 33/45 | 14.3 | 4.8 | 57.4% | 80.6% | 49.5% | 63.7% | 39.4% | 67.4% | 34.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 49/64 | 15.6 | 5.5 | 56.0% | 81.4% | 52.4% | 59.2% | 40.4% | 68.7% | 34.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 16/18 | 16.4 | 3.8 | 56.8% | 79.7% | 51.0% | 64.7% | 34.2% | 67.4% | 35.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 24/28 | 16.2 | 6.6 | 55.5% | 79.7% | 53.3% | 64.7% | 46.2% | 67.8% | 35.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 51/52 | 14.7 | 4.9 | 56.1% | 79.7% | 50.9% | 65.8% | 51.6% | 67.1% | 34.4% | 2003 | 43/47 | 10.1 | 3.1 | 56.5% | 75.0% | 47.9% | 60.7% | 48.3% | 63.4% | 36.0% |
| 27 | 2004 | 23/24 | 12.5 | 5.3 | 56.8% | 77.3% | 45.9% | 57.2% | 39.6% | 63.7% | 33.2% | 2004 | 43/43 | 11.7 | 3.1 | 59.1% | 76.0% | 47.7% | 57.9% | 38.7% | 64.3% | 34.3% |
| 28 | 2005 | 19/20 | 12.2 | 4.5 | 62.8% | 77.2% | 49.4% | 56.6% | 34.3% | 66.7% | 31.2% | 2005 | 15/15 | 12.3 | 3.9 | 56.6% | 76.7% | 45.9% | 58.6% | 27.7% | 63.3% | 32.1% |
| 29 | 2006 | 20/20 | 14.0 | 4.9 | 55.3% | 79.7% | 48.8% | 59.4% | 34.5% | 66.0% | 33.4% | 2006 | 2/2 | 11.5 | 7.0 | 47.8% | 73.2% | 44.1% | 59.7% | 35.0% | 57.0% | 39.4% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2/2 | 9.5 | 5.5 | 58.7% | 79.4% | 39.2% | 37.5% | 20.8% | 62.8% | 26.7% |
| Career | — | 422/484 | 13.9 | 5.2 | 57.6% | 79.6% | 50.0% | 62.5% | 41.0% | 67.0% | 34.7% | — | 105/392 | 11.1 | 3.4 | 57.5% | 75.7% | 47.3% | 58.8% | 40.7% | 63.6% | 34.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1492 | 104.4 | -1.87 | -2.04 | 0.773 | 44.9% | +22 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.10 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1766 | 149.6 | +4.26 | -1.00 | 1.098 | 51.6% | +23 | -186 | -194 | 55.4% | +0.51 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | -0.34 | 1995 | 1487 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1840 | 149.6 | +4.59 | -0.57 | 1.113 | 52.1% | +22 | -218 | -226 | 57.1% | +0.49 | 9–7 (56%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | +1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1854 | 146.5 | +5.16 | -3.42 | 1.028 | 50.7% | -13 | -55 | -123 | 60.3% | +0.36 | 17–3 (85%) | 23–13 (64%) | — | -0.04 | 1997 | 1520 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 1–0 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.59 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1908 | 152.3 | +4.61 | -1.16 | 1.069 | 51.2% | -5 | -126 | -84 | 60.1% | +0.49 | 7–9 (44%) | 14–12 (54%) | — | -1.16 | 1998 | 1755 | 144.7 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -222 | -139 | 53.4% | +0.32 | 13–4 (76%) | 11–12 (48%) | — | +0.72 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1890 | 149.4 | +4.70 | -0.77 | 1.068 | 51.3% | +38 | -161 | -21 | 61.6% | +0.54 | 12–10 (55%) | 16–11 (59%) | — | -1.51 | 1999 | 1763 | 145.0 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -263 | -154 | 51.2% | +0.26 | 8–11 (42%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | -2.53 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1895 | 148.6 | +5.41 | -1.43 | 1.113 | 51.6% | +21 | -144 | +61 | 60.9% | +0.61 | 14–8 (64%) | 26–20 (57%) | — | -0.59 | 2000 | 1819 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | -27 | -296 | -44 | 56.3% | +0.60 | 10–10 (50%) | 10–17 (37%) | — | -1.79 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1804 | 130.5 | +3.11 | -1.38 | 1.076 | 51.5% | +5 | — | — | 58.7% | +0.48 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | +0.83 | 2001 | 1759 | 150.9 | — | — | — | — | +67 | -256 | -39 | 61.9% | +0.81 | 8–6 (57%) | 11–10 (52%) | — | +0.99 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1772 | 147.8 | +3.64 | -0.25 | 1.099 | 51.6% | +15 | -59 | +179 | 50.0% | +0.35 | 5–3 (63%) | 8–16 (33%) | — | -2.36 | 2002 | 1756 | 148.6 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -275 | -49 | 51.9% | +0.44 | 11–10 (52%) | 11–14 (44%) | — | -0.54 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1882 | 149.2 | +4.49 | -1.14 | 1.047 | 50.9% | -35 | -127 | +200 | 60.7% | +0.48 | 10–4 (71%) | 17–12 (59%) | — | -2.84 | 2003 | 1644 | 133.1 | +0.95 | -1.36 | 0.983 | 50.0% | +72 | -213 | +27 | 48.2% | +0.07 | 5–6 (45%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | +1.55 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1650 | 118.2 | +0.10 | -2.14 | 0.915 | 48.5% | -8 | +49 | +352 | 41.5% | -0.52 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–9 (36%) | — | +0.80 | 2004 | 1596 | 125.6 | +0.40 | -1.44 | 0.961 | 49.5% | +33 | -178 | +70 | 44.1% | -0.30 | 3–7 (30%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | +1.48 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1656 | 122.6 | +1.88 | -3.91 | 0.939 | 49.2% | -52 | — | +334 | 48.9% | -0.15 | 2–4 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -0.33 | 2005 | 1559 | 116.9 | -1.32 | -3.12 | 0.876 | 47.9% | +9 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.92 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +0.61 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1732 | 128.9 | +2.70 | -1.85 | 0.984 | 49.8% | -151 | — | +285 | 49.1% | -0.04 | 5–2 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -1.13 | 2006 | 1569 | 105.0 | -1.55 | +1.41 | 0.916 | 48.6% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1505 | 103.5 | -0.27 | -2.33 | 0.719 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1506 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1508 | 103.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2015 | 1708 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2011 | 151.8 | +4.10 | -1.55 | 1.052 | 50.9% | 0 | -124 | +113 | 57.0% | +0.37 | 96–66 (59%) | 158–135 (54%) | 104.5 | -1.58 | — | 1949 | 145.6 | +0.33 | -1.61 | 0.952 | 49.4% | +35 | -250 | -44 | 51.3% | +0.24 | 62–56 (53%) | 82–87 (49%) | 100.1 | -0.01 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 11 | 13 | Feb 14, 2004 | H2H |
| Sjeng Schalken | 6 | 3 | 9 | Oct 16, 2003 | H2H |
| Justin Gimelstob | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jan 6, 2005 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 3 | 4 | 7 | Aug 4, 2006 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jul 25, 2002 | H2H |