H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Jean-Rene Lisnard H2H: 1-0
Mark Philippoussis holds a 1–0 lead over Jean-Rene Lisnard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2003 San Jose third round 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MON
Age 46
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Jean-Rene Lisnard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Jean-Rene Lisnard | #1,437 | #84 | 478 | 1,693 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Jean-Rene Lisnard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #194 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #264 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #97 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #103 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #295 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1437 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |