H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Jim Courier H2H: 3-2

Mark Philippoussis holds a 3–2 lead over Jim Courier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jim Courier leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2000 San Jose semifinal 4-6 6-3 6-4.

AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2000* San Jose ATP 250 SF Hard Mark Philippoussis #17 4-6 6-3 6-4 Jim Courier #44 Match data
Oct 21, 1999* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jim Courier #44 6-3 3-6 6-1 Mark Philippoussis #21 Match data
Apr 24, 1997* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Mark Philippoussis #22 7-5 7-5 Jim Courier #23 Match data
Aug 16, 1996* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Mark Philippoussis #37 7-6(5) 7-6(3) Jim Courier #9 Match data
Mar 5, 1995* Scottsdale ATP 250 F Hard Jim Courier #13 7-6(2) 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #272 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Jim Courier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1
19 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14
23 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22
27 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23