H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Jim Pugh H2H: 1-0
Mark Philippoussis holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Pugh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1995 Los Angeles third round 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1995* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-6(7) | Jim Pugh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Jim Pugh | #1,147 | #37 | 423 | 1,832 | 85 | 95 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Jim Pugh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #60 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #397 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1074 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |