H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-1
Mark Philippoussis and Juan Ignacio Chela are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on clay, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2003 Scottsdale third round 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
| May 15, 2002* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-4 6-4 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |