H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Julien Boutter H2H: 2-1

Mark Philippoussis holds a 2–1 lead over Julien Boutter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julien Boutter leads 1–0 on clay, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2002 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 3-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Julien Boutter
FRA Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Philippoussis #104 6-3 3-6 6-1 6-2 Julien Boutter #50 Match data Jun 26, 2002* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Julien Boutter #55 7-5 7-6(4) Mark Philippoussis #144 Match data May 2, 2002* R32 Munich Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Mark Philippoussis #104 6-3 6-4 Julien Boutter #53 Match data Jan 3, 2002* R32 Adelaide International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,010 291 193 60.1% 0 1 0 2 8 11
Julien Boutter #1,092 #46 790 1,817 62 84 42.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Julien Boutter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,765 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 33–23 58.9% #30 1,840 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,854 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,908 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,890 0 7 — — — — — — —
23 2000 42–22 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 — — — — — — —
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,804 0 9 1998 1–2 33.3% #276 1,510 0 0
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 1999 1–5 16.7% #133 1,476 0 0
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 2000 10–16 38.5% #70 1,600 0 0
27 2004 8–16 33.3% #109 1,649 0 10 2001 25–25 50.0% #53 1,757 0 0
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,655 0 10 2002 16–25 39.0% #77 1,607 0 0
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,731 0 11 2003 8–7 53.3% #110 1,638 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #597 1,587 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Philippoussis Julien Boutter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 20 9 29 69.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 20 11 31 64.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 20 7 27 74.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 28 13 41 68.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2003 24 12 36 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 8 12 20 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
28 2005 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 6 13 19 31.6% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2006 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 178 115 293 60.8% 35 35 70 50.0% 48 22 70 68.6% 30 21 51 58.8% — 21 38 59 35.6% 30 28 58 51.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 10 10 20 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 422/484 of Mark Philippoussis's and 122/146 of Julien Boutter's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mark Philippoussis Julien Boutter
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 4/4 6.0 4.0 58.1% 64.9% 40.4% 42.4% 25.4% 54.8% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 41/42 11.9 4.9 58.5% 79.7% 48.8% 70.4% 41.4% 66.6% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 45/56 14.1 5.9 59.0% 81.0% 47.5% 63.5% 37.3% 67.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 56/61 13.8 5.6 58.7% 79.5% 51.7% 61.7% 42.5% 68.0% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 41/50 12.6 5.0 58.5% 78.7% 49.7% 59.9% 40.0% 66.8% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 33/45 14.3 4.8 57.4% 80.6% 49.5% 63.7% 39.4% 67.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 49/64 15.6 5.5 56.0% 81.4% 52.4% 59.2% 40.4% 68.7% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 16/18 16.4 3.8 56.8% 79.7% 51.0% 64.7% 34.2% 67.4% 35.1% 1998 3/3 9.0 7.7 50.9% 71.1% 38.5% 48.8% 30.2% 55.1% 36.5%
25 2002 24/28 16.2 6.6 55.5% 79.7% 53.3% 64.7% 46.2% 67.8% 35.4% 1999 5/6 6.4 4.0 57.6% 64.3% 50.3% 53.6% 54.0% 57.8% 30.6%
26 2003 51/52 14.7 4.9 56.1% 79.7% 50.9% 65.8% 51.6% 67.1% 34.4% 2000 21/26 11.3 8.2 53.7% 73.5% 45.1% 59.3% 44.6% 60.1% 36.9%
27 2004 23/24 12.5 5.3 56.8% 77.3% 45.9% 57.2% 39.6% 63.7% 33.2% 2001 40/50 9.8 6.7 54.4% 77.6% 49.3% 62.1% 37.5% 64.6% 33.5%
28 2005 19/20 12.2 4.5 62.8% 77.2% 49.4% 56.6% 34.3% 66.7% 31.2% 2002 33/41 9.6 6.0 56.4% 74.5% 52.1% 55.2% 39.7% 64.7% 33.5%
29 2006 20/20 14.0 4.9 55.3% 79.7% 48.8% 59.4% 34.5% 66.0% 33.4% 2003 15/15 7.9 6.5 58.4% 69.5% 51.1% 58.8% 37.7% 62.2% 35.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/5 7.4 8.0 54.0% 72.4% 43.9% 64.1% 38.9% 59.8% 35.6%
Career — 422/484 13.9 5.2 57.6% 79.6% 50.0% 62.5% 41.0% 67.0% 34.7% — 122/146 9.5 6.7 55.4% 74.1% 49.1% 58.7% 39.9% 62.8% 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Philippoussis Julien Boutter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1492 104.4 -1.87 -2.04 0.773 44.9% +22 — — 20.0% -2.10 1–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1766 149.6 +4.26 -1.00 1.098 51.6% +23 -186 -194 55.4% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 13–11 (54%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1840 149.6 +4.59 -0.57 1.113 52.1% +22 -218 -226 57.1% +0.49 9–7 (56%) 19–13 (59%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1854 146.5 +5.16 -3.42 1.028 50.7% -13 -55 -123 60.3% +0.36 17–3 (85%) 23–13 (64%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1908 152.3 +4.61 -1.16 1.069 51.2% -5 -126 -84 60.1% +0.49 7–9 (44%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1890 149.4 +4.70 -0.77 1.068 51.3% +38 -161 -21 61.6% +0.54 12–10 (55%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1895 148.6 +5.41 -1.43 1.113 51.6% +21 -144 +61 60.9% +0.61 14–8 (64%) 26–20 (57%) — -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 1804 130.5 +3.11 -1.38 1.076 51.5% +5 — — 58.7% +0.48 3–7 (30%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.83 1998 1511 108.1 -1.38 -0.56 0.813 45.7% — — — 40.0% -0.80 — 1–1 — +0.07
25 2002 1772 147.8 +3.64 -0.25 1.099 51.6% +15 -59 +179 50.0% +0.35 5–3 (63%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.36 1999 1477 106.8 -1.78 -1.82 0.725 45.1% +25 — — 30.8% -1.46 0–1 1–0 — +0.14
26 2003 1882 149.2 +4.49 -1.14 1.047 50.9% -35 -127 +200 60.7% +0.48 10–4 (71%) 17–12 (59%) — -2.84 2000 1601 126.9 -0.76 -0.56 0.925 48.7% +9 -65 -74 39.1% -0.52 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) — +0.16
27 2004 1650 118.2 +0.10 -2.14 0.915 48.5% -8 +49 +352 41.5% -0.52 2–4 (33%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.80 2001 1758 150.0 +2.01 -1.90 0.945 49.5% -6 -78 — 46.3% -0.17 10–4 (71%) 12–17 (41%) — -3.02
28 2005 1656 122.6 +1.88 -3.91 0.939 49.2% -52 — +334 48.9% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.33 2002 1607 140.1 +1.51 -2.19 0.949 49.2% +18 +107 — 42.1% -0.44 7–8 (47%) 9–14 (39%) — -1.97
29 2006 1732 128.9 +2.70 -1.85 0.984 49.8% -151 — +285 49.1% -0.04 5–2 (71%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.13 2003 1638 120.0 +0.08 -0.27 0.927 49.0% — +100 — 47.5% -0.43 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.44
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1587 102.4 -2.07 -0.42 0.884 48.0% — +89 — 26.7% -0.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.06
38 2015 1708 98.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2011 151.8 +4.10 -1.55 1.052 50.9% 0 -124 +113 57.0% +0.37 96–66 (59%) 158–135 (54%) 104.5 -1.58 — 1818 140.9 +0.75 -1.45 0.923 48.9% +6 +34 -74 42.4% -0.43 25–22 (53%) 30–45 (40%) 99.2 -3.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.