H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 3-1

Mark Philippoussis holds a 3–1 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2006 Newport final 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 16, 2006* Newport ATP 250 F Grass Mark Philippoussis #214 6-3 7-5 Justin Gimelstob #111 Match data
Jul 28, 2000* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Justin Gimelstob #87 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) Mark Philippoussis #19 Match data
Feb 12, 2000* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard Mark Philippoussis #17 7-6(5) 6-4 Justin Gimelstob #95 Match data
Feb 13, 1999* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard Mark Philippoussis #14 6-2 3-6 7-6(0) Justin Gimelstob #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,721 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #576 1,529 0 0
19 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,509 0 0
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,674 0 0
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,596 0 0
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,534 0 0
27 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,508 0 0
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,536 0 0