H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Karim Alami H2H: 2-1
Mark Philippoussis holds a 2–1 lead over Karim Alami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1997 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| May 14, 1997* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Karim Alami | 6-2 6-0 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| May 27, 1995* | Bologna | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Mark Philippoussis | 7-6(9) 3-6 6-2 | Karim Alami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Karim Alami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |