H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 1-3

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–1 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2003 Scottsdale final 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2003* Scottsdale ATP 250 F Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-4 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #90 Match data
May 17, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #10 6-4 7-6(6) Mark Philippoussis #24 Match data
Jun 11, 1999* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #42 6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 Mark Philippoussis #10 Match data
Mar 17, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mark Philippoussis #11 6-3 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 — — — — — — — 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 — — — — — — — 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 — — — — — — — 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30