H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Mardy Fish H2H: 1-2

Mardy Fish holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2006 Newport quarterfinal 7-6(7) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 15, 2006* Newport ATP 250 QF Grass Mark Philippoussis #214 7-6(7) 6-3 Mardy Fish #70 Match data
Aug 13, 2003* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mardy Fish #41 1-6 6-3 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #20 Match data
Mar 14, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mardy Fish #206 6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Mardy Fish
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0
19 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1
23 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2
27 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6