Mark Philippoussis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC
Mark Philippoussis holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1997 Miami Open round of 64 7-5 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | 7-5 7-6(4) | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Mar 19, 1997* | R64 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,010 | 291 | 193 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mark Philippoussis | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #30 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,854 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,655 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,731 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Mark Philippoussis | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1994 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1997 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1998 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1999 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 2000 | 28 | 13 | 41 | 68.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 2001 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 2002 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 2003 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 2004 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 2005 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2006 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 178 | 115 | 293 | 60.8% | 35 | 35 | 70 | 50.0% | 48 | 22 | 70 | 68.6% | 30 | 21 | 51 | 58.8% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Mark Philippoussis | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1994 | 1492 | 104.4 | -1.87 | -2.04 | 0.773 | 44.9% | +22 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.10 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1995 | 1766 | 149.6 | +4.26 | -1.00 | 1.098 | 51.6% | +23 | -186 | -194 | 55.4% | +0.51 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–11 (54%) | 109.1 | -0.34 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1996 | 1840 | 149.6 | +4.59 | -0.57 | 1.113 | 52.1% | +22 | -218 | -226 | 57.1% | +0.49 | 9–7 (56%) | 19–13 (59%) | 103.2 | +1.05 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 1997 | 1854 | 146.5 | +5.16 | -3.42 | 1.028 | 50.7% | -13 | -55 | -123 | 60.3% | +0.36 | 17–3 (85%) | 23–13 (64%) | 115.1 | -0.04 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -88 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.3 | +0.26 |
| 1998 | 1908 | 152.3 | +4.61 | -1.16 | 1.069 | 51.2% | -5 | -126 | -84 | 60.1% | +0.49 | 7–9 (44%) | 14–12 (54%) | 97.0 | -1.16 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | +0.61 |
| 1999 | 1890 | 149.4 | +4.70 | -0.77 | 1.068 | 51.3% | +38 | -161 | -21 | 61.6% | +0.54 | 12–10 (55%) | 16–11 (59%) | 100.4 | -1.51 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.4 | -0.61 |
| 2000 | 1895 | 148.6 | +5.41 | -1.43 | 1.113 | 51.6% | +21 | -144 | +61 | 60.9% | +0.61 | 14–8 (64%) | 26–20 (57%) | 102.2 | -0.59 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.9 | -0.27 |
| 2001 | 1804 | 130.5 | +3.11 | -1.38 | 1.076 | 51.5% | +5 | — | — | 58.7% | +0.48 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–7 (42%) | 89.3 | +0.83 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | 102.9 | +1.26 |
| 2002 | 1772 | 147.8 | +3.64 | -0.25 | 1.099 | 51.6% | +15 | -59 | +179 | 50.0% | +0.35 | 5–3 (63%) | 8–16 (33%) | 95.9 | -2.36 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | 105.2 | +0.62 |
| 2003 | 1882 | 149.2 | +4.49 | -1.14 | 1.047 | 50.9% | -35 | -127 | +200 | 60.7% | +0.48 | 10–4 (71%) | 17–12 (59%) | 109.2 | -2.84 | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.6 | -0.31 |
| 2004 | 1650 | 118.2 | +0.10 | -2.14 | 0.915 | 48.5% | -8 | +49 | +352 | 41.5% | -0.52 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–9 (36%) | 91.8 | +0.80 | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | 90.9 | -0.57 |
| 2005 | 1656 | 122.6 | +1.88 | -3.91 | 0.939 | 49.2% | -52 | — | +334 | 48.9% | -0.15 | 2–4 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.33 | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | +0.30 |
| 2006 | 1732 | 128.9 | +2.70 | -1.85 | 0.984 | 49.8% | -151 | — | +285 | 49.1% | -0.04 | 5–2 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 104.7 | -1.13 | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| 2015 | 1708 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| Career | 2011 | 151.8 | +4.10 | -1.55 | 1.052 | 50.9% | 0 | -124 | +113 | 57.0% | +0.37 | 96–66 (59%) | 158–135 (54%) | 104.5 | -1.58 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | 101.6 | +0.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |