H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 1-0
Mark Philippoussis holds a 1–0 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1997 Roland Garros first round 6-2 4-6 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Mark Philippoussis | 6-2 4-6 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |