H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 3-2

Mark Philippoussis holds a 3–2 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2002 Wimbledon third round 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mark Philippoussis #104 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #54 Match data
Oct 8, 2000* Hong Kong ATP 250 F Hard Nicolas Kiefer #13 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 Mark Philippoussis #15 Match data
Sep 28, 1997* Toulouse ATP 250 F Hard Nicolas Kiefer #71 7-5 5-7 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #21 Match data
May 2, 1996* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Mark Philippoussis #31 6-4 7-5 Nicolas Kiefer #197 Match data
Jan 17, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mark Philippoussis #40 7-6(3) 6-0 6-1 Nicolas Kiefer #166 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6