H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 4-0

Mark Philippoussis holds a 4–0 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics first round 7-6(4) 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Philippoussis #36 7-6(4) 7-6(2) Paul Haarhuis #23 Match data Jul 26, 1996* R64 Atlanta Olympics Olympics Hard
Mark Philippoussis #24 6-3 6-2 Paul Haarhuis #31 Match data Feb 23, 1996* R16 Memphis Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Mark Philippoussis #90 6-1 6-2 Paul Haarhuis #22 Match data Oct 7, 1995* QF Brisbane International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Mark Philippoussis #149 7-6(4) 6-3 Paul Haarhuis #33 Match data Mar 15, 1995* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,010 291 193 60.1% 0 1 0 2 8 11
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,765 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 33–23 58.9% #30 1,840 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,854 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,908 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,890 0 7 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 2000 42–22 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,804 0 9 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0
27 2004 8–16 33.3% #109 1,649 0 10 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,655 0 10 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,731 0 11 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Philippoussis Paul Haarhuis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 20 9 29 69.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 20 11 31 64.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 20 7 27 74.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 28 13 41 68.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2003 24 12 36 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
27 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 2005 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 2006 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 178 115 293 60.8% 35 35 70 50.0% 48 22 70 68.6% 30 21 51 58.8% — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 422/484 of Mark Philippoussis's and 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mark Philippoussis Paul Haarhuis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 4/4 6.0 4.0 58.1% 64.9% 40.4% 42.4% 25.4% 54.8% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 41/42 11.9 4.9 58.5% 79.7% 48.8% 70.4% 41.4% 66.6% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 45/56 14.1 5.9 59.0% 81.0% 47.5% 63.5% 37.3% 67.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 56/61 13.8 5.6 58.7% 79.5% 51.7% 61.7% 42.5% 68.0% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 41/50 12.6 5.0 58.5% 78.7% 49.7% 59.9% 40.0% 66.8% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 33/45 14.3 4.8 57.4% 80.6% 49.5% 63.7% 39.4% 67.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 49/64 15.6 5.5 56.0% 81.4% 52.4% 59.2% 40.4% 68.7% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 16/18 16.4 3.8 56.8% 79.7% 51.0% 64.7% 34.2% 67.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 24/28 16.2 6.6 55.5% 79.7% 53.3% 64.7% 46.2% 67.8% 35.4% 1991 44/50 3.8 2.3 58.4% 68.3% 52.1% 45.9% 48.3% 61.5% 40.2%
26 2003 51/52 14.7 4.9 56.1% 79.7% 50.9% 65.8% 51.6% 67.1% 34.4% 1992 55/62 4.0 1.9 59.8% 70.2% 51.8% 63.1% 41.7% 62.7% 38.0%
27 2004 23/24 12.5 5.3 56.8% 77.3% 45.9% 57.2% 39.6% 63.7% 33.2% 1993 51/56 4.0 2.0 59.5% 69.2% 52.2% 60.9% 43.4% 62.2% 38.2%
28 2005 19/20 12.2 4.5 62.8% 77.2% 49.4% 56.6% 34.3% 66.7% 31.2% 1994 43/48 4.2 2.0 59.7% 68.8% 50.0% 64.0% 48.8% 61.1% 37.1%
29 2006 20/20 14.0 4.9 55.3% 79.7% 48.8% 59.4% 34.5% 66.0% 33.4% 1995 55/57 4.6 2.6 59.8% 68.3% 50.7% 54.3% 40.4% 61.0% 36.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 48/58 4.2 1.8 62.5% 68.2% 51.8% 50.8% 44.9% 62.2% 35.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 37/44 5.3 2.8 59.7% 71.9% 51.2% 59.4% 46.1% 63.5% 37.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 30/40 5.8 3.2 56.4% 71.4% 50.5% 60.7% 45.0% 62.5% 36.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 17/21 5.3 2.4 61.5% 68.9% 48.6% 61.8% 29.9% 61.0% 36.2%
Career — 422/484 13.9 5.2 57.6% 79.6% 50.0% 62.5% 41.0% 67.0% 34.7% — 380/498 4.4 2.3 59.7% 69.4% 51.2% 57.5% 43.9% 62.0% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Philippoussis Paul Haarhuis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1492 104.4 -1.87 -2.04 0.773 44.9% +22 — — 20.0% -2.10 1–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1766 149.6 +4.26 -1.00 1.098 51.6% +23 -186 -194 55.4% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 13–11 (54%) 109.1 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1840 149.6 +4.59 -0.57 1.113 52.1% +22 -218 -226 57.1% +0.49 9–7 (56%) 19–13 (59%) 103.2 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1854 146.5 +5.16 -3.42 1.028 50.7% -13 -55 -123 60.3% +0.36 17–3 (85%) 23–13 (64%) 115.1 -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1908 152.3 +4.61 -1.16 1.069 51.2% -5 -126 -84 60.1% +0.49 7–9 (44%) 14–12 (54%) 97.0 -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1890 149.4 +4.70 -0.77 1.068 51.3% +38 -161 -21 61.6% +0.54 12–10 (55%) 16–11 (59%) 100.4 -1.51 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
23 2000 1895 148.6 +5.41 -1.43 1.113 51.6% +21 -144 +61 60.9% +0.61 14–8 (64%) 26–20 (57%) 102.2 -0.59 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.8 +0.52
24 2001 1804 130.5 +3.11 -1.38 1.076 51.5% +5 — — 58.7% +0.48 3–7 (30%) 5–7 (42%) 89.3 +0.83 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 100.3 -1.33
25 2002 1772 147.8 +3.64 -0.25 1.099 51.6% +15 -59 +179 50.0% +0.35 5–3 (63%) 8–16 (33%) 95.9 -2.36 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -2.69
26 2003 1882 149.2 +4.49 -1.14 1.047 50.9% -35 -127 +200 60.7% +0.48 10–4 (71%) 17–12 (59%) 109.2 -2.84 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) 99.9 -0.46
27 2004 1650 118.2 +0.10 -2.14 0.915 48.5% -8 +49 +352 41.5% -0.52 2–4 (33%) 5–9 (36%) 91.8 +0.80 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) 102.1 -0.40
28 2005 1656 122.6 +1.88 -3.91 0.939 49.2% -52 — +334 48.9% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 96.6 -0.33 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) 104.6 -1.32
29 2006 1732 128.9 +2.70 -1.85 0.984 49.8% -151 — +285 49.1% -0.04 5–2 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 104.7 -1.13 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) 106.7 +0.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) 105.2 +0.88
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) 93.4 -0.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) 103.3 +1.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 89.4 -1.04
38 2015 1708 98.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2011 151.8 +4.10 -1.55 1.052 50.9% 0 -124 +113 57.0% +0.37 96–66 (59%) 158–135 (54%) 104.5 -1.58 — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.