H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Robin Soderling H2H: 1-1
Mark Philippoussis and Robin Soderling are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2006 San Jose fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 41
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2006* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 6-2 6-3 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2003* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-4 6-4 | Robin Soderling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Robin Soderling | #195 | #4 | 6,055 | 2,172 | 285 | 166 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Robin Soderling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #444 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #163 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #17 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 2,070 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #5 | 2,118 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #13 | 2,127 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |