H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 1-1
Mark Philippoussis and Stefan Edberg are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on carpet, while Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1995 Tokyo Indoor third round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1995* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Philippoussis | 6-0 6-2 | Stefan Edberg | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Stefan Edberg | 4-6 6-3 7-6(1) 7-5 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 |